00:00
-:-

Scale and position your image


NOTE: please consider becoming a supporter if you would like to choose a shape.
View Profile Matkingos
Drop file(s), or click here to upload.
    I am awesome, that's pretty much it...

    Matt @Matkingos

    Age 32, Male

    Do-nothinger

    UMC

    Columbia, Missouri

    Joined on 1/6/08

    Level:
    5
    Exp Points:
    274 / 280
    Exp Rank:
    > 100,000
    Vote Power:
    4.50 votes
    Rank:
    Civilian
    Global Rank:
    79,209
    Blams:
    19
    Saves:
    60
    B/P Bonus:
    0%
    Whistle:
    Normal
    Medals:
    1,011

    Comments

    48÷2(9+3)=48÷2(12)=24(12)=288

    If it were 48÷(2(9+3)) THEN it would be 2

    If you're in doubt grab any good calculator, or elementary math book and check it

    I dislike the condescending tone you used here, The obelus or division symbol or ÷, does not mean divide, it is actually a representation of the action of division. What do I mean by this?

    Division is actually just a non-simplified fraction (Ex: ½= .5). The obelus merely states on what side the integers (numbers) should go. Everything on the left side of the Obelus should be in the numerator (top part of the fraction), while everything on the right side is in the denominator (bottom part of the fraction).

    So this makes our equation into something totally different
    __48____
    2(9+3)

    Now the equation is how it is supposed to look without a stupid obelus confusing us. You can tackle this equation in two different ways, you can solve the denominator and simplify the fraction. Or you can cancel the 2 and the 48, solve the denominator, and simplify the fraction. Both answers will give you 2.

    This is why the obelus should be banned from being taught in school, all it does is confuse people. If division was taught to students to be nothing more than fractions it would make math less ambiguous, and make these sort of arguments non-existent.

    Yes, yes you're right.